Sunday, October 21, 2012

Political Street Art Continued


 Street art has a wide array of subject matter. Some street artists, such as Andre and Barry McGee, focus on putting goofy, animated characters on the walls of buildings. Other street artists like the Toasters, Shepard Fairey, Invader, etc. put multiples of the same images up all over cities almost like marking their territory. Roadsworth is a street artist that spray paints images on the road that might make a drive around town a little more entertaining.  With the exception of Shepard Fairey, and perhaps Invader, none of these street artists are widely known; they are known well enough to get in a book but are not as prominent as JR or Banksy. Both street artists incorporate a little bit of politics into their art. Perhaps the public simply likes JR’s and Banksy’s styles or maybe these street artists are so well known because of the messages behind their art.
JR began when he found a camera in the Paris Metro and started taking pictures. Since he found the camera in a public place he felt that it was fitting to put his photographs in a public place.[i] When JR started his photographed images were small, he had to use a six by four inch format.[ii] However, JR figured out how to enlarge his photographed images to cover the side of a building.  JR’s work would clearly be hard to ignore. Imagine walking down the street and seeing a black and white image of someone pointing a gun covering the side of a building, that would be pretty difficult to miss.
JR’s work is meant to provoke; he wants to touch people. He humbly admits that his work cannot change the world but  “…it can only make a difference to how a few people look at the world.”[iii] JR has achieved this through his travels to slums, shanty towns, and troubled places. In Kibera, Kenya, JR used waterproof materials to paint the roofs of houses. He painted portraits of people, a subject matter he tends to stick with, focusing on eyes and mouths. He chose to use waterproof materials to give to the community. He said that Kenyans do not understand art for art’s sake; they focus on essential needs. By using waterproof materials he made their roofs waterproof and therefore his art developed a practical purpose.[iv]
JR decided to tackle possibly one of the largest political issues of today’s world in his Face 2 Face project. In an interview JR said he was discussing the issue of the Middle East with some friends and he asked if anyone one knew any Israelis or Palestinians. Clearly no one did and JR decided that he wanted to go to the Middle East to find out for himself. He was under the impression that Israelis see Palestinians as terrorists attacking marketplaces where women and children are as well as men. And Palestinians see Israelis as humiliating, occupational soldiers who shoot children and ambulances. When JR went to the Middle East he realized that a Palestinian taxi driver is pretty much the same as an Israeli taxi driver. That is when he pasted a humorous image of the Rabbi, the Priest, and the Imam.[v]
While JR was working on his Face 2 Face project people would come up to him and ask what he was doing. JR would tell them that he was working on an art project and the particular part he was painting was “two taxi driver…one is Israeli and one is Palestinian.”[vi] The person who came up to him would be taken aback because “…the enemy was in one of those portraits.” JR would then ask if they could tell which portrait was of the Israeli and which was of the Palestinian and of course the person would be so sure they knew their “own brother” but they would always guess wrong then laugh about it. A special “moment” was unintentionally created between the people who came up to JR and JR himself. JR admits that the idea of how similar Palestinians and Israelis are might have only momentarily been impressed onto some of the people who came up to him, but maybe it is a moment that will last as long as the people who shared it are alive.
 Banksy has also traveled to troubled places to do art. In order to draw attention to the slow recovery of New Orleans after Katrina, Banksy paid a visit and give his support to NOLA Rising, an art activist group started by Rex Dingler. NOLA Rising was started to lift the morale of New Orleans.[vii] Banksy’s focus is not to go to slums and troubled area like JR. Banksy has a different agenda; he focuses on opposing war, Big Brother, corporate capitalism, and hypocrisy.[viii]
Supposedly Banksy believes that the United States is the “belly of the beast” as far as war, corporate capitalism, and hypocrisy goes.[ix] Images of Charlie Brown smoking a cigarette and tipping over a gas can express his distaste. A young innocent American boy, Charlie Brown, has been corrupted by American culture. In another attempt to deface American culture, Banksy “tagged” a billboard of a woman with a bra and jeans on. He added two Disney-like mice; the male mouse was drunkenly grabbing the woman’s chest, and the girl mouse was wigging out on cocaine.[x] How this politically attacks America has yet to be determined, but Banksy could be making a statement on exploiting women in America.
Banksy did travel to Bethlehem, Palestine.  Instead of trying to show how similar Palestinians and Israelis are like JR, Banksy paints an image of a soldier feeding a Donkey. The donkey could be a symbol of Mary and Joseph’s trip to Bethlehem, as the bible tells it.  Here the religious donkey is being hand fed by a soldier. Banksy did not see anything wrong with putting up his street art on the wall. He asks a pretty interesting question, “how illegal is it to vandalize a wall, if the wall itself has been deemed unlawful by the International Court of Justice?”[xi] Banksy did manage to make this place that is thought of to be so incredibly dangerous appear a little less terrorized and a little more “Bandalized,” if you will.
Street art that is frequently looked down upon, and maybe the authorities have a right to think badly of street art. However it street art might look, it has done good things. Banksy has captivated millions with his witty attacks on government. JR has literally helped suffering communities with his art. Shepard Fairey has helped prove how influential street art can be. Street Art itself has given artists a voice that is hard for the public to ignore especially when the art deals with political issues and the public now has the opportunity to look at art for free at any time. Street art can be a really positive influence, if it is looked at in the right way.


[i] Eleanor Mathieson and Xavier A. Tapies, Street Artists: The Complete Guide (London: Graffito, 2012), 108.
[ii] (JR, interview  by Kristie Lou Stout, News, CNN International, October 5, 2012), www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic (accessed October 20, 2012).
[iii] Eleanor Mathieson and Xavier A. Tapies, (108).
[iv] Ibid.
[v] (JR, interview by Kristie Lou Stout).
[vi] Ibid.
[vii] Banksy: You Are an Acceptable Level of Threat  (Great Britain: Carpet Bombing Culture, 2012), NOLA Rising.
[viii] Ibid, Belly Of The Beast.
[ix] Ibid.
[x] Ibid, Banecdotes #6.
[xi] Ibid, Oh Little Town.

Saturday, October 20, 2012

Chivaun I found another street art battle!

Bansky Vs. The Grey Ghost in new orleans

HEY!

I just found a whole bunch of information on Blek Le Rat and wanted to share it with the world because I am so excited I found something!

http://blekmyvibe.free.fr/blekpress.html

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Red Bull Presents...

A map of where you can find street art! You can look up art by artist name, which I recommend! They use google maps to zoom in on artwork. The only problem I can imagine is how up to date this is in terms of if the art is still there. Unfortunately with street art, it's either up for months or it's up for a day before it gets painted over or removed. The artist Space Invader has work that has lasted years. Below is one of the latest editions they added... A Shepard Fairey piece!

http://streetartview.com/



Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Citations for the Presentation on Marco Polo Syndrome


These are our sources we used for Presenting "The Marco Polo Syndrome: Some Problems Around Art and Eurocentrism," by Gerardo Mosquera.

Anthes, Bill1, bill•anthes@pitzer.edu. "Transcultural Pilgrim: Three Decades of Work by José Bedia." CAA Reviews (August 24, 2012): 1-3. Art Full Text (H.W. Wilson), EBSCOhost (accessed September 17, 2012).

Ugalde, Alejandro. "Expectations and Stereotypes of Mexicanness: Diego Rivera in 1930s New York." Art Nexus 6, no. 67 (December 2007): 106-109. Art Full Text (H.W. Wilson), EBSCOhost (accessed September 17, 2012).

Monday, October 15, 2012

Graffiti Art vs Street Art: The Lines have been Drawn


There’s a war going on all around us. It’s a war between two forms of expression and their battlegrounds are the walls of our cities. Graffiti is viewed as a scourge of society and a criminal act. Street art has come to be loved by the community as it appears in galleries and is collected by the upper echelons of the art community.  However, when pitted against each other and though they share common roots, Graffiti and Street Art have very different connotations. Perhaps the best example of this is a graffiti war that took place in a hard to reach tunnel in Camden. Through the artistic battle between King Robbo and Banksy, we understand the inherent ideological differences expressed in the opposing creative approaches of Street Art.
Before you can understand the full scope of conflict, you need to learn about the struggles and motivations of the two opposing sides. When this war began, it started with a simple graffiti tag by King Robbo. He is considered to be a pioneer in the old school graffiti scene in the UK and around the world.[i] He made a name for himself by tagging trains, which are considered to be the most difficult and sought after tagging spots. This trademark of tagging earned him two things that graffiti artists seek. It was both a way to defy authority and to use the trains as moving galleries to be seen by as many people as possible.[ii] Graffiti tags tend to reinforce the male ego and are used as a way to mark the artist’s territory.[iii] The more dangerous or difficult the tag is to make, the more respect the artist commands. The danger and risk involved in creating the tag is merely a bonus. The main payoff for the artist is the creative escape.

The Graffiti tag that was the epicenter of this war was over twenty years old and considered to be one of the oldest Graffiti pieces in London. It was also one of the last surviving King Robbo works. This Robbo piece was partially painted over and the remains incorporated within Banksy’s stenciled Street Art. Banksy stated later that, because the piece was in such a bad state, he hadn’t realized he was painting over a part of London’s history.[iv] Despite what may have been an honest mistake or not, from that point on, it was now a war between Graffiti and Street Art.

Street Art is considered to be a hybrid form of graffiti that utilizes stencils, stickers, posters, sculpture and other media in order to create the artist’s mark and convey their creative statements.[v] Graffiti Art, especially tags, are a vehicle used by the artist to make a statement about who they are while Street Art tends to be more focused on conveying messages about the world at large. Street Art is often used to make political, environmental, or anti-war statements. While these messages and artists are often anti-establishment, they have garnered respect in the art world, none more so than the prolific Banksy.
Banksy is considered to be the world’s best known Street Artist, and just like Street Art, his roots lie in the world of Graffiti. Early on, he realized that he needed to gain speed in order to create his work and grow as an artist. For that he turned to stencils.[vi] This decision is where his ideals as an artist turned away from Graffiti Art values. Stenciling is considered to be cheating in the larger part of the Graffiti community[vii] as it removes the hand of the artist and a large part of the danger involved. However, this also allows the stencil artist to carefully plan out their work and to put further thought and meaning behind it. For example, the Stencil by Banksy in the Camden tunnel could have any number of interpretations. It could be a statement of the commodity of Graffiti, or that Graffiti is staring to become more accepted. It could also be a bit of an insult to Graffiti by saying it is unoriginal and something that can easily be done by anyone. Whatever the meaning, the piece is not just the tag of the artist; it is an image that inspires deeper thought.
Banksy’s Camden tunnel piece also broke one of the cardinal rules of Graffiti art. As King Robbo explained in the Channel 4 documentary Grafitti Wars, “…never incorporate a piece by another artist into your work without that artist’s permission.”[viii] Before Banksy added his contribution to Robbo’s tag, there had already been quite a lot of graffiti drawn over his work by others. However, these were tags in their own right and had never incorporated Robbo’s work into them. In an interview, Robbo stated, “What people don’t realize is that he’d already gone over loads of my stuff before and I hadn’t bothered retaliating but this time it was just so deliberate, so cowardly. If you’ve got the hump about something, you send a message and discuss it like gentlemen, you don’t wipe out a piece of graffiti history. “[ix]
 

King Robbo retaliated with traditional tag lettering to let Banksy know, in no uncertain terms, that he was encroaching on his territory. He did this in a classic lettering style he is known for working in, and he attacked with the wit, rebellion, and spontaneity that had earned him so much respect back in his heyday.[x] He recreated a tag and incorporated Banksy’s work into it, thus making it look like Banksy was paying homage to him. He turned the tables and the battle lines were now officially drawn.
Banksy stated in his book Wall and Piece that, “Graffiti remains gloriously unspoiled by progress.”[xi]  While this is a potentially insulting statement, Banksy underscores a very important point. Like it or not, Graffiti isn’t trying to be anything more than what it is; a statement of the male ego without visceral meaning. Street Art, on the other hand, takes a different creative approach. It uses whatever means necessary to create a commercially acceptable, anti-establishment message that provokes thought in the viewer. The artistic battle between Banksy and Robbo has only begun, but it has revealed that while Street Art has an ideology, Graffiti Art doesn’t need one.

Continued in part two…



[i] Jo Fuertes-Knight, “King Robbo Eclusive Interview: My Graffiti War With Banksy,” Sabotage Times, February 28, 2012 , http://www.sabotagetimes.com/people/king-robbo-exclusive-interview-my-graffiti-war-with-banksy/.
[ii] Channel 4, “Graffiti Wars,” Street Art News video, 46:47, August 15, 2011, http://www.streetartnews.net/2011/08/robbo-vs-banksy-graffiti-wars-full.html.  
[iii] Ibid.

[iv] Ibid.

[v]  Banksy. Exit Through the Gift Shop. DVD. Directed by Banksy. USA : Producers Distribution Agency (PDA), 2010.
[vi] Banksy, Wall and Piece (London: Century, 2006), 13.
[vii] Channel 4, “Graffiti Wars.”

[viii] Ibid.

[ix] Fuertes-Knight, “King Robbo Eclusive Interview: My Graffiti War With Banksy.”

[x] Matilda Battersby, “The Gloves are off: Graffiti Legend King Robbo has resurfaces to Settle a Score with Banksy,” The Independent, April 21, 2011 , http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/features/the-gloves-are-off-graffiti-legend-king-robbo-has-resurfaced-to-settle-a-score-with-banksy-2270575.html.
[xi] Banksy, Wall and Peace, 184.

Street Art: The Power of Location


Perspective in art can be defined by creating a viewpoint for your audience that will best communicate your subject and serve a particular message. The goal of perspective in street art is many times communicated and acted on by choice of location.  The canvas of a street artist is the world and is not confined by what can museum appropriate and the lines of a canvas. It can be placed anywhere and the choice of the location has as much impact to the viewer as the content itself.  Location is used as a tool to further communicate the message the street artist is making to the viewer. If you have the same content in two different locations, the meaning behind could be completely different at each location. One location would have a different perspective than the other even if it were the same imagery of street art.

Carlo McCormick, author of Trespass: A history of Uncommissioned Urban Art, discusses the conquest of space in street art. McCormick states, “Location is everything; context and content are ultimately the most measurable difference between what is written in the bathroom stall and the profound bravado of more heroic feats like Smith and Sanes landmark subjugation of the Brooklyn Bridge, a move so ball-out as the single greatest escalation within the graffiti wars.” [1] The marking of Smith and Sanes in 1988 on the Brooklyn Bridge was an impactful statement strictly based on marking the territory of an icon. If the street artists wrote their name on the side of a motor vehicle it would not have made such a large impact to the viewers.





Filippo Minelli is a street artist that is famous for his work that pointed out the growing disconnect with reality that comes from living a 2.0 lifestyle. Minelli wrote names of the companies that connect us to living a 2.0 lifestyle in locations that give a clear portrayal of the slums of third world. In Bamako, Mali 2008, he wrote FACEBOOK on the side of a landfill and in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 2007 he wrote FLICKR and MYSPACE on the side of slum buildings.  Minelli notes, “Writing the names of anything connected with the 2.0 life we are living in the slums of the third world is to point out the gap between the reality we still live in and the ephemeral world of technologies.” [2] The choice of location brings new context to the names creating a contrasting perspective between or digital life and the realities that exist in third world countries.


Banksy is one of the most well-known and controversial street artist of our time and has work placed across the globe. In 2006, Banksy took a trip to Disneyland in Anaheim, California to place a life-size sculpture of a Guantanamo Bay prisoner inside the Rocky Mountain Railroad ride. A spokeswoman for Banksy said the stunt was intended to highlight the plight terror suspects at the controversial detention centre in cuba.” [3] In the award-winning documentary, Exit Through the Gift Shop, Banksy states while looking at a map of the amusement park, “There’s this site with a picture of a camera on it saying this would be a great place to take a souvenir photo. So, that obviously seemed like the best place to put him.” [4] Other than picking a location in the park that is high in traffic and a place that is common for souvenir photos to have his work showcased in the background of the photos taken, there is a strategic purpose in choosing Disneyland as the location for the work. Disneyland is a fantasy world where visitors become submerged into fairytales and escape the harsh realities faced in everyday life. By placing the Guantanamo Bay prisoner into the fairytale world, Banksy creates a thick contrast between the realities of war that are commonly ignored with the fairytale life we choose to live.

 Banksy en Disneyland

David Ley and Roman Cybriwsky wrote in the Annals of the Association of American Geographers, “The quality and location of graffiti display regularities. They manifest the distribution of various social attitudes and intimate subsequent behavior in space; as such, certain types of graffiti forecast both potential and actual behavior.” [5] The article discusses how the context of street art is not just dependent on the imagery alone. Who did the work and the location of the work are just as important variables. If teenage gangs performed street art for territorial markers, the imagery may indicate a name or contested space. However, if street art were performed in an ethnic neighborhood it would have a higher probability of being related to social change.  Street artists place tremendous value on the location of their work to further emphasize their message behind the perspective. [5]

In 2007, Laura Keeble, a London based artist, created a piece titled Idol Worship at cemetery in South End, Essex, England. She created a series of tombstones out of polystyrene, plaster and spray paint for global brands, such as McDonalds, Chanel, and Nike.  The purpose of the work was to look at belief systems and idol worship of corporations. By marrying death with the corporate identities of popular brands creates a pause for thought in the viewers’ perception of corporate dependency. The location of the street art plays a large role in the perspective and message behind the work. By placing the tombstones of corporate identities in an area where prayer is commonly practiced, the context of the work and the message to the viewer changes. Keeble was aware of the locations’ common practice of prayer and used the location as a tool to convey her message to the public. [6]

 

In The Work on the Street: Street Art and Visual Culture, Martin Irvine wrote, “The social meaning of street art is a function of material locations with all their already structured symbolic values. The city location is an inseparable substrate for the work, and street art is explicitly an engagement with a city, often a specific neighborhood. Street artists are adept masters of the semiotics of space, and engage with the city itself as a collage or assemblage of visual environments and source material. A specific site, street, wall, or building in London, New York, Paris, or Washington, DC is already encoded as a symbolic place, the dialogic context for the placement of the piece by the artist.” [7] Street artists convey some sort of message in their work and create a process of thought to the viewer. Whether it is a territorial mark, a reflection of social change, or a political statement, there is a message behind the work and the location of the work plays a large role in communicating the message.


[1] Carlo McCormick, Trespass: A History of Uncommissioned Art (Los Angeles, CA: Taschen Publishing, 2010), 51.
[2] Ibid.,74.
[3] BBC News, “Artist Banksy Targets Disneyland,” BBC News online; available from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/5335400.stm > (accessed 12 October 2012). 1.
[4] Banksy. Exit Through the Gift Shop. DVD. Directed by Banksy. USA : Producers Distribution Agency (PDA), 2010.
[5] David Ley and Roman Cybriwsky, “Urban Graffiti As Territorial Markers,” ANNALS of the Association of American Geographers Vol. 64, No. 4 (1974): [journal on-line]; available from JSTOR digital library, < http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2569491?uid=3739616&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21101152264283> (accessed 8 October 2012). 491.
[6] Carlo McCormick, Trespass: A History of Uncommissioned Art (Los Angeles, CA: Taschen Publishing, 2010), 51.
[7] Martin Irvine, The Work on the Street: Street Art and Visual Culture, Pre press version of a chapter in Barry Sandywell and Ian Heywood, The Handbook of Visual Culture (London & New York, NY: Berg, 2012), 235-278, (Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC: 2012), 4.